Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 21:40 on June 28, 2019, around the entrance of the factory of the victim B (the 59-year-old), and around 21:40, the Defendant parked his own small-scale vehicle and prevented the entrance of the factory, and was punished by the victim and the Si expenses. The Defendant continued to drive the said vehicle in his hand, and attempted to leave the said vehicle. However, the Defendant was waiting in front of the said vehicle in order to prevent the occurrence of the occurrence, and proceeded with the victim from leaving the right side of the vehicle, and led the victim to a shock of the said vehicle, which requires approximately three-day medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous object vehicle and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. A survey report (CCTV verification);

1. Photographs (the photograph of the accused and the victim suffering from both violence);

1. CCTV image data CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education and the Order of Community Service are the Defendant’s punishment for parking expenses with the victim.

Although the victim tried to leave the vehicle and try to leave the site, he/she proceeded with the victim by driving the vehicle as it is in the expectation of driving while driving the vehicle.

When the victim is expected to drive the vehicle in the vehicle, the victim saw the vehicle, and the victim saw the play, and the defendant's criminal liability is not easy in that the victim inflicted an injury on the victim by a very dangerous method, such as enhancing the speed of the vehicle again and shocking the side of the bridge of the victim.

However, it shall be considered in favor of the victim, such as the fact that the defendant was punished by a fine, the payment of medical expenses, and mutual agreement, the fact that the defendant was erroneous, the fact that there was no penalty power, except for a fine imposed once.