The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2012, at around 22:45, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, assaulted the victim’s body tightly in front of the “Ecafeteria” located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, on three occasions, and C assaulted the victim’s body tightly in three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement of witness F in the third protocol of trial;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc.;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the confession and reflection of this part, and the fact that the degree of crime is not serious);

1. The portion not guilty of a fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. On June 3, 2012, at around 22:45, the Defendant, in collaboration with C in this part of the facts charged, was dissatisfied with the victim G (30 years of age) who had been engaged in credit transactions in the street room in front of the “Ecafeteria” located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and had been engaged in credit transactions for several years, and was able to drink at another store, and Defendant A was spawd with the wall by drinking the victim’s face at one time, and C was spawd with the victim’s arms, thereby leaving the victim’s arms for about four weeks to undergo approximately four-day medical treatment.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that, as stated in the facts charged, G’s face was not sealed to the wall by drinking once, as stated in the facts charged. However, G was defective in consultation on how to fully pay off G that does not pay the drinking value, but G refused to do so, while the Defendant was able to sit down on the roadside, leading the Defendant to knife and knife his hand, and during that process, the Defendant was knife with the body of one another.

The evidence that is consistent or consistent with this part of the facts charged is the witness H (Second), the witness F (third) and the substitute.