The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as an acting driver, is a democratic class B, and the victim C is a manager in charge of the EF area as a management director affiliated with D call substitute driving.

피고인은 D 콜 대리 운전 관리 소장인 피해자에게 서로 다른 콜 센터에 연결된 대리 운전기사들의 보험을 공유해 달라고 요구하였으나 피해 자가 대리 운전기사들의 보험은 각 콜 센터 별로 가입을 해야 하고 같은 프로그램( 대리 운전 배차 프로그램) 을 사용하고 있는 콜 센터 간 대리 운전 기사들의 보험 공유만 가능함을 이유로 피해자 운영의 D 콜 대리 운전에서 보험 공유를 거부하자, 2015. 10. 19. 19:00 경 G에 있는 H 편의점 옥상에 “ 대리기사 착취, 흡혈하는 악덕 대리업체 심판하자”, “ 보험 공유 외면하는 D 콜 센터 타도 하라!!” 라는 모욕적 표현이 기재된 현수막 2점을 게재하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Even based on the expression itself written on banner by the Defendant, it is not a content that slanders the victim’s individual, but slanders the victim.

In other words, the expression stated in the above facts charged is not an expression that may undermine the social evaluation of the victim, but an expression that may undermine the social evaluation of the substitute driver with the head of the management office.

B. It is known that A.I.D. or proxy officers manage the above D call center company in E area with the Director of the Management Office.

However, in light of the content of the above expression, such circumstance alone is difficult to deem that such act exceeds the above agency driver’s insult against the victim’s individual.

In addition, the instant complaint was filed by the victim and was not filed by the said D Call Center.

Therefore, without examining other issues, the facts charged in the instant case is proven.