A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) by the Defendant, at around 01:30 on November 11, 2019, driven a B SP-type vehicle and traveling from the half-string distance in the Seogu-gu, Seogu, Seo-gu, in the direction of two kinds of neons, the Defendant runs away without disregarding the demand of the police officer for stopping who was dispatched to the scene after receiving 112 report.

On November 11, 2019, at around 01:37, arrested as a flagrant offender in front of the Daegu-gu C, Seogu, Daegu-gu, and was transferred to the Grand Organizational Police Station located in 15-gil 259, Seogu, Daegu-gu.

On November 11, 2019, at around 02:23, the Defendant was required to comply with the alcohol measurement by inserting the whole breath to four times from the above date to 02:44 the same day, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize the Defendant as driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, smelling, snicking, snicking, etc., from slope E at the D Team office of the Daegu Western Police Station D Team.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

2. On November 11, 2019, at around 03:00, the Defendant damaged public goods, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender as prescribed in paragraph 1(1) at the D Team office of the relevant Daegu Police Station as well as the Seoul Police Station’s D Team office, and the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s monitors by cutting the knife to cut the knife in order to cut the knife while the knife was connected with the knife with the knife on the knife and the knife on the knife and the knife on the knife, so that monitors and knife would not operate.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged monitoring and printing, which are goods used by public offices, thereby impairing their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police concerning F of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation reports on respective statements of G and H (report on the status of a driver), investigation reports (Attachment to vehicles involved in accidents and photographs of D team offices);

1. The provisions of the Act and subordinate statutes shall apply to the report on the actual condition of alcohol driving control and the report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver.