1. On March 4, 2017, the Defendant confirms that a resolution in which D was elected as president at an ordinary general meeting of shareholders on March 4, 2017 is invalid.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a clan that makes a common ancestor Eul (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant's clan"), and the plaintiffs are the members of the defendant's clan.

B. On February 13, 2017, the Defendant clan notified the convening of the instant general meeting of shareholders in 2017 (hereinafter “instant general meeting”) under the name of the Defendant clan F, the president of the Defendant clan, and D. On March 4, 2017, the Defendant clan held the instant general meeting of shareholders at the multi-purpose community center located in Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, which held on March 11, 2017 and passed a resolution to select D as the president (hereinafter “instant resolution”).

C. Meanwhile, on March 1, 2014, D was appointed as the president at the ordinary meeting of the Defendant clan on March 1, 2014, and on May 11, 2015, from the lawsuit that Plaintiff B filed against the Defendant clan for the confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of appointment of the president (U.S. branch court 2015Gahap11242) to confirm that the resolution of appointment of the president is null and void, and the relevant judgment of this case became final and conclusive on April 13, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3 evidence, Eul evidence 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' general meeting of this case was called D and F as the joint convening authority, and D was not the legitimate representative of the defendant clan, and F did not consent to the convocation of the general meeting of this case.

Therefore, since the general meeting of this case is not convened by legitimate convening authority, the resolution of this case made by the defendant clan at the general meeting of this case is null and void.

B. On February 9, 2017, the defendant clan member F consented to the convening of the instant ordinary meeting, and D was a legitimate representative of the defendant clan before the relevant judgment became final and conclusive. Thus, the instant ordinary meeting is called by the legitimate convening authority.

3. Determination

(a) clans for the appointment of the representative of the clan of the relevant law branch;