1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal History (Defendant A)

1. Defendant A violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic) (hereinafter “E”), is a person who operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “E” from September 20, 2017 to November 14, 2017, Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon.

Defendant

A employed 40,00 won from 40,000 to 170,000 won, and had the above women engage in a similar sexual intercourse that has been used or has been used as a sexual intercourse, and half of the price of sexual intercourse received from the customers in the room prepared within the business place.

Accordingly, Defendant A committed acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant A violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, including brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (commercial traffic advertisement) paid KRW 300,000 to F, an Internet site, from October 12, 2017 to November 14, 2017, and posted an advertisement to guide contact numbers, etc. of the said E business establishment.

As a result, Defendant A recommended or induced the purchase of sex.

3. On September 2017, 2017, Defendant A also requested that G met with B at the above E coffee shop, and “W 2,500,000 won per month in operating a sexual traffic business establishment” to “W 2,50,000 won per month. When the control is conducted, the width goes beyond the fine due to the absence of a previous conviction, and L L LW’s request to be operated outside the fine.” In September 2017, Defendant A drafted a lease agreement with G in the office of lessor H located in the vicinity of the said business establishment with G L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L, which was duly adopted and examined by this court (such as the witness G’s statement, etc.). In accordance with the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the expression of indictment was deleted and corrected ex officio.

G On November 14, 2017, when the fact of sexual traffic brokerage by the police was prevented, it is the same upon the request of the defendant A.