1. The Defendants shall deliver each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is a temple affiliated with the I religious organization (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s temple”). Defendant B (Legal Name J) was appointed as the chief inspector of the said temple on March 13, 2008, and the term of office on March 12, 2013 expired.

B. On March 19, 2013, the Director of the General Affairs Office of the I Religious Organization took a disciplinary measure against Defendant B regarding “10 months of termination of termination of termination” on the ground that Defendant B committed an act of harming the administration of religious affairs. On March 29, 2013, the Director of the I Religious Organization appointed K (legal L) as a new chief executive officer of the Plaintiff’s temple following a resolution of the General Council of Executive Officers.

C. Although Defendant B filed an objection to the above disciplinary action, the Monetary Punishment Committee of I religious Organizations became final and conclusive on May 8, 2013, the Defendant B’s “one year of suspension of right of termination.”

Attached Form

Each real estate indicated in the list is owned by the plaintiff temple, and the defendants currently occupy the above real estate.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, 3, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination prior to the merits

A. The Defendants’ defenses by the Defendants do not constitute a legitimate representative of the Plaintiff’s temple, and thus, the instant lawsuit filed by K to the effect that it is unlawful.

B. (1) The plaintiff's temple did not have any internal dispute over the past appointment of the plaintiff temple.

At the time of April 29, 199, M and registered winners of the Plaintiff’s temple were delegated to the Director of the Office of General Affairs to the Director of the Office of General Affairs, and the Defendant B was appointed to the Director of the Office of General Affairs on March 13, 2008 through the past procedures.

(2) On June 25, 2012, I religious organizations established NFO in the 2012 spring, which has the jurisdiction over the temple in the area of the Si, Do, Jin-si, and Jin-si, and appointedO to the head of the religious affairs office on June 25, 2012; however, the director of the head of the religious affairs office has retired from the office of the head of the religious affairs office due to his personal circumstances; and thereafter, the head of the religious affairs office is the head of the religious affairs office.