1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Attached Form 1(1) that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on May 31, 2016.

1. The first instance court’s decision on the scope of this Court’s adjudication only revoked the disposition rejecting disclosure of information under Paragraph (4) and dismissed the Plaintiff’s remaining claims, among the disposition rejecting disclosure of information under Paragraph (1) through (4) information under Attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant information”). The Plaintiff appealed only for the part against which information under Paragraph (1) was lost, and the Defendant appealed as to the part against which information under Paragraph (4) was revoked.

Therefore, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the disposition rejecting disclosure of the information of paragraphs 1 and 4 of this case that the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.

2. On May 17, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of the instant information, but the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting the disclosure of the instant information on May 31, 2016, on the grounds that Article 9(1)6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) and Article 9(1)7(7) of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) regarding the instant information were likely to infringe on the confidentiality or freedom of private life).

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of evidence A1 and 2, and purport of the whole pleadings

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. (1) The defendant's defense prior to the merits does not retain the information of Paragraph (1) of this case. Thus, the plaintiff does not have any legal interest in seeking revocation of the disposition rejecting the disclosure of information concerning the information of this case.

Article 3 of the Information Disclosure Act provides that "Any information held and managed by public institutions shall be actively disclosed, as prescribed by this Act, to guarantee citizens' right to know."

According to the contents of No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings, I think the case.