A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2014, around 01:21, the Defendant: (a) was sent back from the police box of the Jung Franc Police Station, who received 112 report due to taxi charges on the front of the “C convenience store” in Seoul, Jung-gu; and (b) was sent back from E and a slopeF.

the Gu shall be subject to the Gu.

The Defendant, who was urged from the above E and F to return home to her friend, expressed his desire to “Y friju frich f frich frich frich frich frich,” and the above E and F cannot get out of the patrol vehicle because they should be called, and obstructed the course of the patrol vehicle by blocking the front of the patrol vehicle while boarding the patrol vehicle, and continued to interfere with the course of the patrol vehicle by continuously stopping the front of the patrol vehicle, while taking a bath, and assaulting the back glass of the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the reason that the suspended execution is more than the fact that the defendant is pening his mistake in depth, the degree of violence, and contingency crimes committed under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment heavier than imprisonment with prison labor;