1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff in respect of the defendant B, who falls under the money ordering payment below.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person operating the Busan Jin-gu Busan Metropolitan Government D Ground Building (hereinafter “instant building”) under the name of son, who registered the business in the name of son, and registered the business in the name of F. Defendant B is a person who operates the restaurant (hereinafter “instant restaurant”) with the trade name “G” after registering the business in the name of Defendant C, who is his father, from the first floor of the instant building to the 1st floor of the instant building.

B. Defendant B installed a mobile standing signboard indicating “G” (hereinafter “instant standing signboard”) at the entrance prior to the entrance of the instant building. In order to supply electricity to the instant standing signboard, Defendant B linked the electric line from the standing signboard to the container at the entrance of a restaurant.

C. On September 21, 2013, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as damage to the right 1, 2, and 2, to the upper part of the upper part of the electric line installed by the Defendant B, which was discharged from the front part of the instant standing signboard, in order to enter one’s pawnor on September 21, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). 【No dispute exists, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 19 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 3, 17, 18, 21, and 22, the testimony of the witness of the trial, the inquiry of the witness of the trial court of the first instance into the Busan Jin-gu Environmental Sanitation Department, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Claim against the defendant B

A. According to the facts of recognition of the occurrence of one liability for damages, the above defendant shall not install the signboard of this case in India with a large number of pedestrians, and even if the installation of household is permitted, despite the fact that there is a duty to manage the signboard of this case to prevent pedestrians from being affected by pedestrians, such as not extending the electric line connected to the signboard of this case to India or fixing it to India, the above defendant's construction and management error of the above defendant's structure, which caused the accident of this case.