The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged and collected KRW 2,00,000 from the Defendant.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on additional collection under the latter part of Article 116 of the Attorney-at-Law Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.