Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

around 11:50 on February 19, 2018, the Defendant destroyed the said car in amounting to KRW 5,374,160 on the cost of repair by putting the string part of the victim’s vehicle on the floor and reducing the string part of the upper part of the string string string string string string string 2018 on the ground that the Defendant was unable to operate the vehicle due to the DMW car owned by the victim C, which is parked in that area.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. The defendant asserts that photographing photographs, internal investigation reports (on-site investigation, etc.), investigation reports (related estimates), CCTV images (which only carried out a string line by hand, and do not destroy a flag by using a material.

(1) However, when using CCTV images, the defendant is able to use words on the surface, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife.

In particular, at the time of the first sonship legal doctrine, the Defendant was able to verify the parts on his own hand (one minute 1 seconds in video). ② The witness E appears to have observed the case accurately (one minute 30 seconds in video), and the Defendant’s flick and flicking the car.

statement is made.

③ During the time when the victim parks a vehicle, the victim seems to have been only the Defendant (which means a single letter of opinion on the one side of the evidence record). Moreover, there is no circumstance that the said vehicle was destroyed by any other circumstance.

④ Since the Defendant was in a state that the victim’s vehicle was obstructed at the time, the motive for committing the crime is sufficient.

In full view of these circumstances, the application of statutes can be fully convicted of the facts charged

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The nature of the crime is not very good in light of the criminal sentencing method of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.