Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On April 19, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to 8 months of imprisonment for a violation of the Building Act at the Seoul Central District Court on April 27, 2013. On November 13, 2014, Defendant C was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence on June of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Building Act at the Suwon District Court on November 13, 2014, and became final and conclusive on November 21, 2014.

[2014 Height680] No person shall contract or execute construction works by using the name or trade name of a constructor or lend a construction business registration certificate or construction business registration pocket book from a constructor.

Nevertheless, around August 2010, Defendant A, at the H Building Office located in Young-si G in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, through land developer B, sent the trade name, construction registration certificate, etc. of the speculative construction to the J (ju) who is a constructor at Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, through land developer B, but caused J to undertake construction after reporting the commencement of construction as if the speculative construction was constructed.

Defendant

A, including this, constructed a building in collusion with the owner of the building of the building at issue, and constructed a building by lending the trade name, etc. of the constructor at least nine times in collusion with the owner of the building at issue.

[2014 Highest 7069]

1. Defendant B and Defendant C’s co-principal are the actual owner of a building located in K in Young-gu, Suwon-si (a multi-living facility among Class II neighborhood living facilities in the business facility group, a total eight floors, and a total floor area of 894m2). Defendant C had Defendant C perform the construction work on March 16, 2012.

Where a person intends to change the purpose of a Class II neighborhood living facility belonging to a business facility group for which approval for use has been granted into an apartment house belonging to a residential business facility group, he/she shall report it to the competent

Nevertheless, on July 2012, the Defendants conspired and did not report, and set up a 32 room of the above building in the 32 room of the first police officer, which is an independent residential form.