A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant used C’s vice-chairperson and D’s vice-chairperson to serve as C’s president and identified the apartment execution project, and D agreed that D will take over KRW 5.5 billion to G, which was planning the new apartment construction project in Gwangju Northern-gu F around April 10, 2015. However, even though it was practically lacking the capacity to promote the above apartment construction project, such as the acquisition price and the purchase price for the new apartment, it was decided to borrow the bonds and borrow the money to use it as the cost for lending the bonds above.

On May 5, 2015, the Defendant, at the “J” office of the victim I’s operation of the Gwangju Mine-gu, the Defendant is running apartment project with the Chairperson D and the Chairperson D in Gwangju Northern-gu, and the land purchase fund is flicker.

If a site is purchased, it can be sold in a short period because it was ordered to be constructed in K construction.

30 million won may be loaned to the effect that it is difficult for the victim to use 300 million won and that the victim may lend 120 million won.

It is intended to sell 20 million apartment bonds after six months from the loan of KRW 120 million to the victim.

The term "the victim made the victim enter into a contract for lending and borrowing of consumption with D around the 6th of the same month and a pre-sale contract."

However, since there was no fund for the execution of the apartment project in this case, even if the victim borrowed money from the victim, it was impossible to purchase the apartment project site with such money, and due to the failure to obtain the approval of the housing construction project plan of the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor, there was no intention or ability to sell two apartment bonds to the victim within six months.

The defendant shall belong to the same month from the injured party.

7.A person has received a remittance of KRW 120,000,000 from the L account in the name of D as the borrowed amount.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with D.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;