The defendant shall be innocent.

1. 공소사실 피고인은 2012. 5. 20. 15:00경 군산시 C 소재 피고인 소유의 공터에 피해자 D이 차량을 주차시켰다는 이유로 동네사람들 3명 가량이 있는 위 장소에서 “야, 씹할년아, 썅년아 왜 차를 여기에 주차시켰어”라는 욕설을 하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. On May 20, 2012, the defense counsel: (a) the Defendant’s husband, worked at the company on May 20, 2012, and the Defendant was in his house and did not have a public box owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant public box”); and (b) on June 2012, the Defendant visited the instant public box and was divided into conversations with the victim; (c) the Defendant did not insult the victim; and (d) took the victim’s desire to the victim.

Even if the performance is not recognized, it asserts that the performance is not recognized.

First, on May 20, 2012, whether the defendant was guilty or not, the victim's investigative agencies and the victim's statements are made in this court.

The victim consistently stated that the date and time of insultd by the investigative agency from May 20, 2012 to this court is certain and consistent, and in this court, the victim stated in this court that “the husband of the Defendant dynasium, dynasium, dynasium, dynasium, dynasium, dynasium, dynasium, dynasium, dynasium,” and the husband

However, according to witness E and G testimony and evidence submitted by the defense counsel, it is recognized that the defendant's husband E had worked in the company on May 20, 2012 and had worked from 08:30 to 17:30.

Therefore, it is difficult to believe that the victim's statement contrary to this is in trust.

Ultimately, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant had been on the instant factory site at around 15:00 on May 20, 2012, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, as stated in the facts charged by the defendant.