The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2015, around 19:00 on June 13, 2015, the Defendant placed one punishment equivalent to 69,000 won in a bank, which was displayed by using a cresh in which the victim F’s surveillance was neglected, in the E store located on 9th floor of the D department store located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the investigation report (specific suspect), list of seizure;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 200,000 won to suspend the sentence;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

1. The defendant's defense counsel's assertion as to Article 59 (1) of the suspended sentence Act (the above sentence shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder due to depression and stimulative disorder at the time of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant was suffering from stimulative disorder at the time of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant was partly affected by stimulative disorder, the contingent crime, the damage caused by the crime of this case is minor, the damage was recovered, the injured party was not punished by agreement with the injured party, the recognition of the crime of this case and the depth of the crime of this case, and the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act). The defendant's defense counsel's assertion that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder due to depression and stimulative disorder at the time of the crime of this case. According to the records, it is recognized that the defendant suffered from stimulic disorder and stimulative disorder disorder at the time of the crime of this case.