The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The Prosecutor appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, 40 hours of order, and 3 years of employment restriction order) is too unfluent and unfair. However, in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case including the following: (a) the degree of damage to the instant assault, assault, bodily injury, special property damage, and special assault crimes; and (b) the Defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal history or fine; and (c) the Defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same criminal history or fine, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed on the Defendant is too unflu

Since the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, it shall be dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the “statement of statement,” in Part 6, 15 of the judgment of the court below shall be dismissed ex officio by “statement of statement,” and the judgment of the court below shall be corrected by adding “1. Selection of punishment,” and “each imprisonment choice,” in Part 9 of the judgment of the court below after