Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 31, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) in the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court on October 31, 2008.
On November 10, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and eight months for a crime of larceny (thief) in the same court, but the Defendant accepted the Defendant’s request for re-adjudication and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny (thief from April 17, 2010 to September 10) in the same court on July 24, 2015.
On the other hand, on December 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months for a crime of larceny in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the same court, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 15, 2014.
1. On July 26, 2014, around 02:00, the Defendant discovered that the door of the victim C’s Eknife car parked on the street in front of Fagpo City D was not locked, and opened a door of the vehicle and entered into the entrance into the vehicle, and then stolen the victim’s credit card and cash 2.40,000 won with one unclaimed wall in the market price.
2. On August 7, 2014, around 00:43, the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F, who was parked in the H dental street located in G on the victim F’s I Sposposp car located in G, but did not commit an attempted crime because the Defendant was discovered to the victim, who was in the invaded vehicle, and was shotly parked in the victim F.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals the victim's property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. C’s statement;
1. On-site reports on the results of meals;
1. Report on investigation (related to fingerprint appraisal and response);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (Binding force of the same kind), and current status of acceptance of each individual;
1. Habituality of judgment: Recognition of dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the same kind of crimes in the judgment;