The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On November 28, 201, the Defendant had a loan broker whose name in the facts charged is unknown submit documents stating that he/she applies for loans of KRW 75,00,000 for the purchase fund of KRW 75,00,00 to an employee whose name the victim’s company’s name is unknown, at the office of the victim Aju Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) in the Dae-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 28, 201.

However, the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant, under the name of the Defendant’s wife, applied for a loan in the name of C, as if he purchased the above Track as he purchased the above Track; and (b) even if he borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was granted KRW 75,00,000 (hereinafter “the instant loan”) from the victim as a second installment loan around that time.

2. According to the Defendant’s legal statement and the certificate of motor vehicle transfer, the fact that the Defendant was granted a loan from the Defendant’s wife E in the name of the actual owner of the instant fleet, and that the Defendant was granted a loan from the Defendant’s East C in order to repay the loan thereafter, as shown in the facts charged in the instant case, can be acknowledged as if the Defendant transferred the instant fleet to the Defendant’s East C in the name of the victim.

In addition, in this court, the defendant, E and C are the family relations of the victim, and E are not assigned to C, and if the defendant was aware that he was transferred only to C in the name of the Tracter owner to repay the existing debts, the victim was given the loan.