beta
Text
1. Defendant B caused the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) to recover the title of the real estate stated in the separate sheet.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On February 2012, Defendant B entered into the instant sales contract. Around February 2, 2012, Defendant B specified the land number, land category, and area as only the size of E forest land E 2,399 square meters, 529 square meters before F, and 413 square meters in G field (hereinafter referred to as “land”) with D, the Plaintiff’s representative.
(2) On April 25, 2012, the Plaintiff and Defendant B drafted an agreement stating that the amount of KRW 270 million out of the land price of KRW 900 million under the above agreement is KRW 900 million (Contents: real estate collateral loans amounting to KRW 230 million, civil engineering design cost amounting to KRW 12 million, and 30 million, and the amount of the remainder would remain 628 million, and from April 25, 2012, the Plaintiff and Defendant B were liable for the Plaintiff.
3) On August 1, 2012, E-2,39 square meters of H forest was subject to registration conversion into 2,476 square meters of H forest on August 1, 2012, and was divided into 678 square meters of H forest, 558 square meters of J forest, 81 square meters of J forest, 173 square meters of K forest, 69 square meters of L forest, 69 square meters of M forest, 9 square meters of M forest, 249 square meters of N forest, and 413 square meters of G field was divided into 319 square meters of G field and 94 square meters of O field on August 1, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”).
(4) On December 24, 2013, the Plaintiff and Defendant B confirmed that the remainder of KRW 82 million remains, excluding succession to bank loans, purchase price, and taxes and public charges, from KRW 900 million of the purchase price of the said land, Defendant B entered into an agreement with the effect that the Plaintiff shall pay to Defendant B by March 31, 2014 (hereinafter “instant sales agreement”).
B. Defendant C’s new construction of the instant building and the establishment of the right to collateral security against the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”) concluded a construction contract with P Co., Ltd. and Q Q, and concluded a construction contract with two multi-household houses on each of the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”).
the building of this case was newly built.