The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected it is favorable.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was subject to suspended execution with respect to the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license) in the year 2014. However, the Defendant again committed the instant crime, which is disadvantageous to the nature of the instant crime, and the risk of recidivism is also high.

In full view of the records and arguments of this case, there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the party, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court's punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.