beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【2016 High Court Decision 2883】 The Defendant issued the exercise notification under the name of the third unit commander of the Army 2819 unit 2819 to participate in the second supplementary training conducted at the training place in the Osan-si on September 27, 2013 to the members of the homeland reserve forces consisting of one member of the homeland reserve forces in Osan-si.
9. He did not participate in the training without good cause, even though he knew of the fact that he received the B apartment in the Gyeonggi-si, the 115 Dong 206.
【2016 High Court Decision 1884】 The Defendant is a member of the homeland reserve forces belonging to Osan-si.
1. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant’s office at Osan City B apartment, 115 Dong 206, and the same year.
3. From October to November, 11 of the same month the notice of a call-up for training in the name of the third unit commander of the Army No. 2819 to participate in the training conducted at the training site of the Osan-si Reserve Forces (16 hours).
Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.
2. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant’s office at Osan City B apartment, 115 Dong 206, and the same year.
3. On December 12, 199, the training call notice was issued in the name of the third unit commander of the Army No. 2819 to attend the second unit training (6 hours) conducted at the training site of the Yongsan-si Reserve Forces.
Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.
3. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant’s office at Osan City B apartment, 115 Dong 206, and the same year.
3. On the 13th day of the Osan-si Reserve Forces training site, a notice of a call-up for training under the name of the third unit commander of the Army No. 2819, to attend the second unit training for the next half of the year (6 hours) training conducted.
Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.
Summary of Evidence
【2016 High Court Decision 1883】
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. An accusation, a written confirmation of facts constituting an offense, a written delivery of a muster notice, a receipt of a muster notice, etc.;