logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2017.11.21 2017가단968
임대차보증금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,933,189 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from January 23, 2017 to November 28, 2017.

Reasons

1. Article 2 (Duration) of the 15th day of each month (15th day of each month) of the 20,000,000 lease deposit for basic facts, and the 800,000,000 won (paid on October 15, 201) shall be delivered to the lessee by October 15, 2010, and the term of lease shall be from the date of delivery to October 14, 2012 (24 months).

Article 1 of the Special Agreement provides that the lessee may not demand the lessor to pay the premium for the facility costs after the termination of the contract and for any other purpose, and the lessor shall, at the request of the lessor, return the facility to the original state within one week.

Article 5. The whole amount of surtax and public dues (acquisition tax and other dues) generated for the purpose of business activities shall be borne by the lessee in full.

On October 21, 2010, the Plaintiff leased the instant store with the Defendant as follows with respect to the store underground (hereinafter referred to as the “instant store”) located in the Mayang-si, Jeonyang-nam (hereinafter referred to as the “instant store”).

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

After entering into the instant lease contract, the Plaintiff operated a singing room at the instant store, and thereafter renewed the said contract and used the instant store.

On October 14, 2016, the instant lease agreement was terminated and the said store was delivered to the Defendant.

The Plaintiff received KRW 5,00,000,000, out of KRW 20,000,000 from the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The term of the instant lease agreement was terminated upon the expiration of the term of validity, and the Plaintiff delivered the instant store to the Defendant, and the Defendant is obligated to refund the remainder of the lease deposit, deducting the unpaid rent of KRW 2,600,000 from KRW 15,000,000, from the remainder of the lease deposit. 2) The Plaintiff did not agree with the Defendant to bear an increase in the rent under the instant lease agreement (entertainment tax).

arrow