A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 15, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of obstructing business operations and assault at the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 21, 2018.

around 01:10 on March 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) heard the phrase “Esing room” operated by the victim D in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, about 01:10 on March 6, 2018; (b) made the victim’s speech that “if the victim wishes to play any more than a female helper, additional expenses should be paid to him/her”; (c) took the victim’s bath; and (d) took the victim’s face, which is a dangerous object on the table; and (e) damaged the victim’s face that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

On March 16, 2018, at around 07:45, the Defendant 2018, was eating the knife and the knife at the “H” restaurant of the “H” restaurant of the victim’s G operation in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu., on the ground that the preceding day’s execution was ordered, etc., the Defendant laid down the small knife and the knife on the table and laid down the knife on the table, and laid down the chair on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property equivalent to 50,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 811"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A report on internal investigation (limited to the attachment of shots and field photographs);

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Investigation report (the confirmation of the previous records): 2018 highest 934;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous conviction: Application of a copy of judgment;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act recognize and reflects his mistake.