beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: (a) for KRW 261,53,257 and KRW 201,00,000 among them, from March 8, 2017 to 60.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The plaintiff is a A apartment in the Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").
In order to manage 514 households, Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings”) is applicable.
(2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a corporation that newly built and sold the instant apartment, and D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is a corporation that built the instant apartment.
3) Defendant Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”)
(B) The instant apartment is a guarantor who entered into a contract for the repair of defects with respect to the instant apartment. B. The instant apartment was subject to a pre-use inspection on October 30, 2012. (c) The order of the execution of a contract for the repair of defects and the instant apartment was 1 E on October 30, 2012, 205 to October 595,028, 2028, 6312 F. 30 to October 30, 2012, from October 29, 2017 to October 29, 2017, 314, 315 G G G 3153 to October 30, 2012, the Plaintiff was organized as a guarantee guarantee creditor by the head of the relevant Gu (the Plaintiff was changed to the guarantee creditor.)
) As indicated below, the warranty contract was concluded and the warranty bond was issued as indicated below (hereinafter “instant warranty bond contract”).
(D) A. D. The construction of the instant apartment does not construct the part that should have been originally constructed in accordance with the design drawings, or changed the construction differently from the defective construction or design drawings. As a result, there was a functional, safety, and aesthetic defect in the section for common use and section for exclusive use of the instant apartment.
2) The Plaintiff requested the repair of defects in D after the date of the usage inspection of the instant apartment, but the instant apartment still has the same defects as the attached Tables 1 and 2 in the attached Table 1 and 2.