beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) on April 22, 2011, the Plaintiff 156,631,649 won, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of the said amounts.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) D No. 17:19 on April 22, 2011 (hereinafter “accidentd vehicle”)
(C) If a pedestrian passes a crosswalk at a speed of about 13 km from the long distance room in the front road of Gwangju Dong-gu, and the pedestrian is driving along the crosswalk, due to the negligence of failing to perform his/her duty of care to temporarily stop and check the safe passage of the pedestrian, and caused the plaintiff A, who was driving the crosswalk to the right side from the left side of the vehicle in the accident, due to the shock of the plaintiff A, who was driving the road in front of the left side of the vehicle in question, and caused the plaintiff A to suffer an injury, such as the left-hand upper alley of the upper upper upper half of the road in Gwangju-gu, and the ethropic pathal pathy (hereinafter referred to as the "accident in question").
(2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the accident vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 4 (including each number, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the accident vehicle.
C. Inasmuch as Plaintiff A was in a state where the pedestrian signal, etc. at the crosswalk was not occupied at the time, it was erroneous for Plaintiff A, even though it was necessary to examine well the left and right in crossing the crosswalk, in order to keep the direction of the vehicle involved in the accident. Plaintiff B and C, as the protection and supervisor of Plaintiff A, are liable to neglect Plaintiff A to cross the road that is highly dangerous to traffic accidents. The victim’s fault appears to have contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages. Accordingly, this is considered in light of the following circumstances, i.e., the victim’s fault was recognized by each image as 10 to 25 of the evidence No. 4.