(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단489

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단489

특수상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2017, at around 17:10, the Defendant: (a) sent to the victim C (here, 48 years of age) located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (b) sent contact with the victim; (c) sent the Defendant’s living together, on the ground that the Defendant her drinking alcohol on the ground that the Defendant she was drinking at the above main points of the week; and (d) taken the brick, which is a dangerous object used by the Defendant, and was fit on the part of the victim’s right blue.

The written indictment states that "the defendant carried the victim's breath and led the victim out of the main place." However, according to the victim's legal statement, the victim took the defendant out of the main place and was not forced by the defendant. Thus, this part is excluded from criminal facts.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and put about about about 14 days a elbbow blue blue and blue blue blus, etc. to the right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Protocol of examination of a witness E;

1. A victim's photograph and brick photograph;

1. A medical certificate of injury [Judgment on the argument of the defendant and his/her defense counsel]

1. The summary of the argument was not that the Defendant had the wall against the victim, but was placed on the side wall at the entrance of the main point, and the victim did not comply with the brick of the Defendant.

2. The following circumstances revealed by each of the above evidence on the board, i.e., ① the victim stated in this court that “the defendant was faced with the student bridge where the defendant was faced with the blue and the blue of the blue and the blue of the blue and the blue of the blue of the blue.” The victim stated that “the defendant was faced with the blue of the blue and the blue of the blue and the blue of the blue after the occurrence of the instant case,” ② even if based on the photograph taken by the victim on the blue of the blue after the occurrence of the instant case, the victim was faced with the blue part of the blue part

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2015.04.10 2015노677

-서울북부지방법원 2018.11.16 2017고단2225

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2020.07.24 2020고정127

-제주지방법원 2020.04.24 2020고단215

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.06.21 2018고정895