The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment and suspension of sentence) is too unfased and unreasonable;

2. In full view of the following, the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s forgery and use of official documents and private documents related to the selection of the location of the rural waste disposal facilities; (b) thereby undermining the trust in administrative activities; and (c) the document forged and forged

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are as shown in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act, Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act for the crimes in question;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (a person who forges and uses a letter of recommendation and a crime of uttering of a private document in the name of K with the largest offense, a crime of forging a private document in the name of K with the largest offense, a punishment determined for the crime of uttering of a private document, a crime of forging a private document in the name of K with the largest offense, a crime of uttering of a site selection committee meeting, and crimes of forging a private document in the name of N with the largest offense, each crime of forging a private document in the name of N with the largest offense, and punishment stipulated for the crime

1. Selection of a fine for the crime of forging private documents and the crime of uttering of private documents which choose punishment;

1. From among concurrent crimes, one of the crimes prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 3, and 50 of the Criminal Act and the crime committed by concurrent crimes shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor and the nature of the crime committed by concurrent crimes prescribed in the name of the committee for the selection of the location of the comprehensive rural waste treatment facilities with the largest criminal situation;