logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.10 2018누47914
공정대표의무위반시정 재심판정 취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

In the first instance court’s decision, the Plaintiff trade union sought the revocation of the order of correction as to “an act of not gathering the opinions of the Intervenor trade union during the collective bargaining process in 2016, an act of not allocating working hours to the Intervenor trade union and a full-time officer, an act of not providing an office of a trade union, and an act of not gathering the opinions of the Intervenor trade union during the collective bargaining process in 2016, an act of not gathering the opinions of the Intervenor trade union during the collective bargaining process in 2016, an act of not gathering the opinions of the Intervenor trade union during the period of 2016, and an act of not allocating a full-time officer of the trade union (hereinafter referred to as “the part related to the exemption of working hours each”, “the part related to the full-time officer of the trade union”) and the part related to Article 9(1) of the collective agreement in 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the collective agreement”).

Therefore, since the plaintiff trade union has appealed only to the part concerning "an act of not providing an office of trade union", only the above part is subject to the judgment of this court for the plaintiff trade union.

The details and details of the decision of reexamination are about 6,920 full-time workers and the company that manufactures and sells cars in Daejeon Factory, Geumsan Factory, Central Research Institute, etc.

Plaintiff

A trade union is a company-level trade union which is a higher-level organization C, and is composed of approximately 4,150 workers belonging to the plaintiff company.

Plaintiff

On November 4, 2015, a trade union was decided as a representative bargaining trade union at the negotiation unit of Plaintiff Company.

The Intervenor Trade Union is an industrial trade union established on February 8, 2001 for the organization of workers engaged in the field of metal industry.

arrow