A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 2014, the Defendant: (a) retired from the position of a company B (hereinafter “B”) to a liquor wholesaler of an unlimited partnership C (hereinafter “C”); (b) instead of continuing to engage in a business against a customer secured at the time of B’s employment, the Defendant agreed to pay for liquor payment obligations, etc. that each of the said transaction parties assumed with respect to B on behalf of C.

Accordingly, as the C Fund was insufficient for repayment, it was used as a practice of providing interest-free financing to the customer of the liquor company, and it was decided that D pay for alcoholic beverages that D bears by borrowing KRW 80 million from the Lijin corporation (hereinafter “Hai Jin-ro”) under the pretext of support for D, which is the customer.

In the process, D's receipt of the loan from E E and creation of a appearance that guarantees the change, it had the intention to forge a promissory note, etc. in the name of D' E and deliver it to D's E to E's E.

On December 17, 2014, the Defendant entered the “amount of money” column in the “amount of money,” and “date of payment” column in the “amount,” column in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the “amount,” in the office of an unlimited partnership company C located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and in the “amount,” and in the “date,” respectively, and possessed a forged “E” column.

E’s seal has been affixed.

As a result, the Defendant 20 copies of Promissory Notes in the name of E respectively.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place of No. 1, submitted 20 copies of the Promissory Notes, forged, to the officials in charge of Tin-ro, who are aware of the forgery, as if they were duly made available.

3. The Defendant forged a private document on the date and time, place, and each page for the performance of the obligation jointly and severally, using a verification color pen to “amount of obligation” column, “the amount of repayment” to “amount of obligation” column, “the period of repayment” to “ January 2015 to August 2016”, and “the period of repayment” to “the amount of monthly premium” column, and “the method of repayment”.