Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 2,386,00 to Plaintiff C, and each of them.
Reasons
1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;
2. Judgment by public notice;
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act;
B. Part 1) In general, where property damage is incurred due to non-performance or tort, the mental suffering that the contracting party suffered shall be deemed to have been recovered by compensating for property damage. Thus, the consolation money for mental suffering may be recognized only where the other party knew or could have known of such circumstance. In addition, where it is impossible to determine the amount of damages due to the difficulty of proof even if the occurrence of property damage is recognized, such circumstance may be considered as the ground for increase in consolation money. However, such complementary function of consolation money is to be supplemented to a certain extent by calculating consolation money in a criminal case where it is impossible to determine the amount of damages, so that it is impossible to recover damages due to non-performance or tort (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da18719, Apr. 15, 207; Supreme Court Decision 2008Da81979, Apr. 18, 207). 197.