logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.08.21 2013고단2048
위증
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five months, for six months, for six months, and for one year, for Defendant C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 5, 2013, around 14:40 on February 5, 2013, Defendant A appeared and took an oath in the Seoul Southern District Court No. 409, the Seoul Southern District Court, which was located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, as a witness of the above case, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. against Defendant C (i.e., the Arrangement

In the testimony at the 11 Germany of the above court in the trial of the above case, the defendant testified that "D was operated at the time of crackdown," of the prosecutor's "I give testimony to "I am I am I am I am I am I am I am am am am am am.", and the prosecutor's testimony to the effect that "B was given testimony to "I am am I am am am am. I am am am. I am am am a day, but I am am a day when I am am. I am am. I am am. I am am am. I am am. I am am. I am am. I am am. I am. I am. am. I am. am. I am. I am. am. I am. am. I am. I am. I am. I am. am. am................."

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant, from November 201 to the second floor of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, was a female employee who had massages and sexual traffic from around November 201, and C was the president who operated the above marina business, and accordingly, the Defendant was not the Defendant but the person who paid daily allowances to B.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant B

A. On February 5, 2013, around 14:40, the Defendant is present at the Seoul Southern District Court 409, located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, as a witness of the Defendant’s case, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. against Defendant C, the said court’s 2012 High Court Decision 409, supra.

arrow