1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On December 30, 2016, around 18:27, the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven along the third lane of the third lane road in front of the Haba-dong, Haba-dong, Haban-dong, a traffic accident in which the Defendant’s vehicle changed from the second lane to the third lane in the front direction (hereinafter “instant accident”) caused the shock of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

C. On February 2, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 669,900 of the insurance money as the repair cost for the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 7, and 8, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall arguments and arguments as to the statements and images set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 6, and No. 9, it is reasonable to view that the accident in this case was caused by the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle who changed the vehicle as soon as possible, without considering the situation of the vehicle flow along which the vehicle flow is fixed, while the two-lane, which is the running road of the defendant vehicle at the time of the accident in this case, was stopped by all vehicles at the front side, while the three-lane road of the plaintiff vehicle, which is the running road of the vehicle in this case, was relatively smooth for the vehicle traffic.

The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff’s driver was negligent in contributing to the occurrence of the instant accident by running the vehicle without turning the headlight at night. However, according to the video of the evidence No. 5, the road of the instant accident site is adjacent to a very frequent spreading of the vehicle.