logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.07.11 2018고정1509
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and B are owners of one parcel, both Da and 1 (hereinafter referred to as “principal parcel of land”), and the victim D is a corporation established for the purpose of land development.

Around April 2017, the Defendant and B develop the victims and the main land and jointly proceed with the other canal wells project. The Defendant and B, the owner of the instant land, are entrusted with the overall duties of the other canal wells project on the condition that approximately KRW 9.9 billion is paid to the victims. The victims entered into a joint agreement to select a contractor and select a seller as a sales agent, advertise, publicize, trust contract, and civil works, and the victim completed the modification of authorization and permission and change of modification during the process of civil works and constructed a sampling.

However, on January 23, 2018, the Defendant unilaterally notified the victim of the rescission of the joint project agreement, and began to execute 2 samples and 2 samples under the Defendant’s initiative, and applied for provisional injunction against obstruction of construction with the Government District Court around April 27, 2018.

Accordingly, the victims set up a banner "I will publicly announce that all the rights of the current site shall be in the Dispute Resolution D and will be a legal measure in the execution of construction other than in the Dispute Resolution D."

1. The Defendant who destroyed and damaged property, from May 6, 2018, the same year.

6. By up to 17.1, it was destroyed by removing approximately 800,000 won of the market price installed by the victim as above from the land by the method of removing approximately 8 times.

2. Around June 19, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s work by force by employing a number of figures on the land at this case, putting the victim’s access road to the site of the construction site in front of the road, installing a door, and filling it as a key, making it difficult for the victim to have access to transported vehicles, such as building materials, by using a key.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1.The police of F. F.

arrow