logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고단2338
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등재물손괴등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2013, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc. damage, etc.) said, around 18:15, that “Around May 1, 2013, the Defendant Docked the Defendant’s wife D, who had drinking together at the Defendant’s house, that “I would see that I would see that I would see that I would see that I would see that I would see that I would see that I would see at the house of the Defendant, and that I would see that I would throw away I would see “I would see I would see. I will see. I will see. I will see. I will see. 21 m in length)”, which is a dangerous object in the margin.

Therefore, the defendant, who was the victim on the table 112, caused the damage to the telephone board 10,000 won in the market price jointly owned with the victim due to the above network.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, has prepared two kitchen blades [2 (30cc in total length, 19.5cc in total length, 29cc in total length, 16.5cc in total length)], which are dangerous things in the kitchen clocks, for the purpose of threatening police officers to be dispatched to the police station upon receipt of the above D’s report at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

As the police officer F and sloping G, a police officer belonging to the Ulsan Middle Police Station Estation in the field of the scene, the defendant sent the above kitchen F and sloping G to crosssection two kitchens, and the defendant threatened the police officer with a dump and continuously driving away.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a kitchen, which is a dangerous object, and obstructed the police officers' legitimate performance of their duties concerning the handling of criminal reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Seized articles, on-site and photographs of damaged telephones;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear and report the victim's telephone statement, and to verify telephone prices);

1. Article 3 (1) and Articles 2 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Selection of Punishment of Crimes;

arrow