1. Attached Form;

1. The remainder after deducting the expenses for the auction from the proceeds thereof, each real estate entered in the list of real estate is attached to auction; and

According to the purport of Gap evidence 1-1 to Gap evidence 2-2 and the whole purport of the arguments, the annexed sheet is as follows.

1. It is recognized that the Plaintiff and the Defendants owned each real estate listed in the real estate list (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) according to the share ratio in attached Table 2 attached hereto, and that the Plaintiff attempted to divide the real estate with the Defendants, but did not reach an agreement between the parties.

Therefore, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of each real estate of this case, may file a claim for partition with the court pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act. The number of co-owners of each real estate of this case, which is the object of co-ownership, is the majority of co-owners, and the share of each co-owner is diverse, and the co-owner's share is diverse, and it is difficult to obtain permission for partition from the competent authority in case of a sub-ownership based on the share of each co-owner, and thus, it is deemed that the division in kind is practically impossible or the value of each share may be reduced even