logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.31 2015고단3461
무고등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the owner of the building on the F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was paid KRW 3 million as the down payment for the same day from May 20, 2001 to May 20, 2002, the term of lease with G, the Defendant, the Defendant, from May 20, 2001 to May 20, 200, entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant as the deposit amount of KRW 15 million per month, and received KRW 3 million as the down payment for the same day from the Defendant, the Defendant, as the down payment for the same day, and KRW 12 million as the remainder payment for the lease deposit on May 16, 201.

From May 2001 to April 2002, the Defendant received 400,000 won each month, from May 2002 to July 2002, and from May 5, 2002 to July 2002, and thereafter, the Defendant renewed the lease contract from May 201 to May 2013.

On May 2013, the Defendant had terminated the lease contract with G, the Defendant, the Defendant, and demanded the return of the lease deposit from the Defendant, which was paid in cash from May 2001 to July 2002 from the Defendant, with the payment of the said lease deposit and the rent from May 2001 to July 2002. Therefore, the Defendant was willing to not refund the lease deposit to the Defendant, using no clear evidence therefor.

1. On August 2014, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming the name map of the building with the Defendant as the Plaintiff and the Defendant as the Defendant, despite the receipt of both the deposit deposit and the rent agreed upon by the Defendant G, the Defendant alleged that “The Defendant occupied and used the Plaintiff’s building without paying the deposit and the monthly rent from May 2001 to July 2002. As such, the Plaintiff is ordered to order the said building and pay the unpaid rent (including additional rent due to the unpaid deposit).”

The defendant deceivings the court in the above manner and tried to take over the above amount from the defendant defendant, but the defendant shall submit evidential data.

arrow