logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.11 2016나2048851
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the claims against the defendants expanded by this court are all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The contents to be stated in this part of the basic facts are identical to the part on the grounds of the judgment of the first instance except for the following modifications, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] 1-

C. 2) The alteration of subsection (2) as follows is 2) The medical personnel of the Defendant Council to the Plaintiff while the Plaintiff is hospitalized, the medical personnel of the Defendant Council against the Plaintiff, and to mitigate the pain on September 16, 2009, strokes (hereinafter referred to as “dexstrins”).

) 5m (e.g., administering 6m) by means of injection on nearby land.

hereinafter the same shall apply.

On the 30th of the same month, in order to alleviate the symptoms of the stehyer, the stehye, prescribed the stehye, which is a steh drug, and administered 2/3 of the 5mg tritrins again in order to alleviate pains, and 10.4. and the same month, which is the following month.

7. 1/2, 11. of the same month, each of which contains 1/3 of 5m Dextrins.

A person shall be appointed.

2. Summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion against the Defendants

A. After the instant traffic accident, the Defendant Company’s sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disease”) was the following.

As seen in the paragraph, the Plaintiff’s medical personnel and the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel to treat the Plaintiff’s injury caused by the instant traffic accident were generated from the stroke medicine.

Therefore, the defendant company is the defendant vehicle insurance company under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

As seen in the foregoing paragraph, Defendant C and Defendant C, jointly with each other, are liable to pay the Plaintiff losses incurred from the disease of this case as insurance money.

B. Since the stroke medicine for Defendant C and Defendant Corporation is likely to cause serious side effects such as the disease of this case in the event of a long-term administration, a doctor must observe the patient’s condition closely and carefully, regulate the volume of the stroke medicine, and prescribe the volume thereof carefully.

arrow