logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.12.24 2014나1045
소유권이전등기
Text

1. On the basis of the plaintiffs' claims expanded in the trial, the judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status and inheritance relationship 1) The Plaintiffs’ father D (hereinafter “the deceased”).

(2) On January 15, 2013, the deceased died on January 15, 2013. (2) The deceased, who is the heir of the deceased, and the defendant, the defendant, the non-party F (the defendant was a co-defendant with the defendant, but the conciliation was established on December 3, 2013 between the plaintiff and the plaintiff), and the inheritance of E is 2/11, and the inheritance of the plaintiffs and the defendant are 2/11, respectively.

3) G is F’s wife as the deceased’s wife. B. At the time of the deceased’s death of inherited property, there was no positive inheritance or inheritance liability. C. Property 1) on March 26, 2012, the deceased donated each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] to the Defendant on March 26, 2012, and donated each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] to F and G on July 3, 2012.

The date of transfer of ownership of each real estate and the market price at the time of the deceased's death shall be as shown in attached Table 2

2) The Deceased’s money donation of KRW 98,00,000 to the Defendant on early October 1997 (the Defendant purchased S from Nonparty R around early 1997, and the Deceased purchased part of the purchase price on behalf of the Defendant), KRW 40,00,000 on October 12, 2010, KRW 50,000 on January 19, 2012, KRW 50,000 on March 7, 2012, and KRW 120,384,650 on October 120, 20, KRW 1107,50 on March 31, 201, and KRW 17,00 on each of the appraisal corporations (the Plaintiff paid part of the purchase price to R on behalf of the Defendant), and there was no dispute over the purport that each of the appraisal corporations’ market price was included in KRW 10,00,00 on March 7, 2012.

2. According to the facts found above, the Plaintiffs, as co-inheritors of the deceased, did not inherit any property as co-inheritors, are deemed to suffer a shortage in their own legal reserve of inheritance by donating the real estate and money listed in the separate sheet No. 1 to the Defendant, F, and G. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant shall be entitled to legal reserve of inheritance to the extent of

arrow