logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.12 2017고단3208
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 3208"

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On February 14, 2016, the Defendant is the maximum advertiser of D by phone call to the victim who had a common friendship.

At present, VIP Bioconference, which is in progress in D, can purchase a well-known book at a low level.

Sending a product photograph;

(1) The transfer of money to anyone who wishes to purchase the subject.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have led D's advertisement, and did not have participated in the F's meeting, and even if he received money from the injured party, he was planned to use it as living expenses, etc., so that he did not have the intention or ability to purchase a name tag.

The defendant deceivings the victim by the above method and was delivered KRW 3.4 million to the injured party on February 14, 2016.

B. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant continued to make an investment of KRW 30 million from 120 to 2 million to 30 million to 1.2 million to 2 million to the victim.

At present, 10 10 million won and 300 million won have been operated, so that we see the Re-examination.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have worked in a foreign bank, and did not invest 30 million won in or operate 300 million won. Even if the Defendant received an investment from the injured party, the Defendant was planned to use it as living expenses, etc., and thus did not have any intent or ability to pay the above profits.

The defendant deceivings the victim by the foregoing method, and was delivered KRW 10 million as investment money on February 29, 2016 to the injured party.

2. Fraud to victims E;

(a) The Defendant, on September 5, 2016, shall ensure that “the Defendant shall purchase shares, and shall make an investment of at least 20% per day.”

The phrase “transfer of funds to the bank account under the name of the bank” was false.

However, the defendant did not have intended to purchase shares.

arrow