Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on June 16, 2013, the Defendant d'E, working for the victim of the first floor of the Sinpo City C building, had drinking together with F, G, and had drinking with F, and had am in contact with the instant F, while doing so, the Defendant d's am together with F, and am in line with F, and am in line with F, and am in line with F, and am out of the scam, and am out of the scam, and am in line with F, and am in line with F, by having customers go together.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with F and interfered with the victim's main management by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is that the defendant, even though he had a record of committing the same kind of crime several times, was sentenced to night-time intrusion larceny and larceny, committed the crime of interference with the business of this case at the time when one month has passed since the execution of the sentence was completed, and the nature of the crime is poor.

However, the defendant's punishment shall be determined in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has made an agreement with the victim D while in depth.