1. The Defendant’s disposition of restricting participation in bidding rendered on April 22, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company running telecommunications business, broadcasting and communications convergence services, multimedia services, research and technology development, etc.

B. On June 7, 2012, the Defendant published a public notice of goods bidding on the “Seocheon-gu Model of Public Services Model for Broadcasting and Communications Convergence” (hereinafter “instant business”).

On July 4, 2012, the Plaintiff participated in the said bidding and determined as the final successful bidder, and entered into a contract on the instant project (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant, which was the contract amounting to KRW 729,954,00, and the contract term from July 4, 2012 to November 30, 2012, and the delivery term was determined as November 30, 2012.

(The details of the above public announcement, participation, contracts, etc. shall be examined again in paragraph (2) below.

The Plaintiff completed the instant project at the time of delivery of the instant contract.

감사원은 2015. 1.경 피고에게, 이 사건 사업은 그 실질이 정보통신설비를 설치하는 정보통신공사로서 정보통신공사업법 제31조 제1항에 따라 공사업자는 도급받은 공사의 100분의 50을 초과하여 다른 공사업자에게 하도급을 하여서는 아니됨에도, 원고는 이 사건 사업 전부를 ‘서울시 양천구 파리 공원 Media Park 구축공사’와 ‘서울시 양천구청 방송통신융합서비스 개발 및 HW 계약’으로 나누어 각각 주식회사 인튠(이하‘인튠’이라고만 한다)과 주식회사 코드앤(이하 ‘코드앤’이라고만 한다)에 도급기관 모르게 일괄 하도급하였다는 이유로 원고에 대하여 지방자치단체를 당사자로 하는 계약에 관한 법률(이하 ‘지방계약법’이라고 한다) 등에 따라 부정당업자로 지정하여 입찰참가자격을 제한하는 등의 조치를 할 것을 통보하였다.

E. On April 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) Article 31 of the Information and Communication Work Business Act regarding the instant business to the Plaintiff.