logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.05.14 2013고정439
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. False entry, such as public electromagnetic records;

A. On December 2, 2011, the Defendant presented a false sales contract, the sales price of which is KRW 195 million, which is KRW 195 million, to the said certified judicial scrivener office in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and the fact that the seller C sold 301,00,000,000,000,000, to the buyer D, the sales price was KRW 125,000,000,000.

Accordingly, on December 2, 2011, a registered public official who is not aware of the fact in the registration division of the vice-branch of the Incheon District Court shall enter the amount of the transaction into the register of the aggregate buildings of the above real estate into the "195,000,000 won" when completing the registration of the transfer due to the sale as of October 12, 201.

In this way, the defendant made a false report to a public official and made it recorded false facts in the register of aggregate buildings which are the same electronic records as the original copy of the notarial deed.

B. On December 23, 2011, the Defendant presented a false sales contract with the sales price of KRW 195 million, in spite of the seller’s sale of KRW 120,000,000,000, in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon District Certified Judicial Scriveners Office, and the seller’s sale of KRW 202,000,000,000,000 to the buyer F, the Defendant had the said certified judicial scrivener employee who is not aware of such fact file an application for the registration of ownership transfer, such as a false sales contract.

Accordingly, on December 23, 2011, a registered public official who is not aware of the fact in the registration division of the vice-supporting branch of the Incheon District Court shall enter the amount of transaction into the register of the aggregate buildings of the real estate in F in November 24, 201 and the amount of transaction in F in the register of the aggregate buildings of the real estate in F in November 24, 201.

In this way, the defendant made a false report to a public official and made it recorded false facts in the register of aggregate buildings which are the same electronic records as the original copy of the notarial deed.

2. Events such as false statements and electromagnetic records; and

A. The defendant set forth in paragraph 1(a).

arrow