logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.19 2015고단6528
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습폭행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Where the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on March 18, 2010; on July 22, 2010, the same court was sentenced to a fine of one million won as the same crime; on May 26, 2011, the same court was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for the same crime; on June 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime of injury in the same court on November 15, 2012; on March 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for the same crime of injury; on September 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 as an assault; on September 16, 2013, the Seoul District Court was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1500,000 as a fine of the same offense.

On October 12, 2015, at the “D Park” office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 09:30 on October 12, 2015, on the ground that the Defendant was aware of having requested the head of the management office of the relevant place to provide coffee, the Defendant continued to receive the head of the victim E (64 years old) who was on the part of the head of the relevant management office, for the reason that the victim E (64 years old) who was on the part of the head of the relevant management office and was dissatisfied with the correction of the defect management office.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Any statement made to the accused in part suitable for such statement in the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The criminal facts in the judgment are sufficiently recognized in light of the records of each crime in the judgment, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind.

On the other hand, the defendant is the victim.

arrow