The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment (2 million won of fine and 40 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) of the lower judgment is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following facts: (a) the police officer reported and dispatched by the Defendant openly insulting the police officer; (b) the nature of public performance and obscenity was poor despite the police officer’s detention; and (c) the Defendant does not seem to be against the police officer by being investigated by the police; (b) the Defendant’s partial denial of a crime; (c) the Defendant’s history of punishment can be taken into account; (d) the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation; (d) the Defendant’s age, motive for the crime; (e) background leading up to the crime; and (e) other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, the Defendant’s argument

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.