logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.31 2017나41259
근저당권말소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (b) the loan " from F to F" 11 on the second to 10 on the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance: (c) the loan to D through F (However, the father of C seems to have directly remitted the remainder of KRW 95,00,000 except for the prepaid interest amount of KRW 5,000 on the account of D); (d) the "No. 1 to 7" in the fourth part of the second part of the judgment is as follows: (c) the "No. 1 to 9 on the ground of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance"; and (d) the "after the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance," the second part of the judgment did not demand or demand direct payment of interest to D even if the payment of interest was delayed; and (d) the Plaintiff received additional money from F as a claim for loans to D after the application for voluntary auction.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow