1. The defendant

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 1,241,050 and its amount.

Facts of recognition

On September 13, 2013, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant from October 10 to October 10, 2015, the lease deposit of KRW 600,000, monthly rent of KRW 600,000, monthly management fee of KRW 30,000, and monthly management fee of KRW 30,000. On October 10, 2013, the Plaintiff transferred the instant building to the Defendant and thereafter occupied and used the instant building until the date. The fact that the Defendant refused to pay rent to the Plaintiff from May 10, 2014 to May 10, 2014 is without dispute between the parties, and the purport of the entire statement in subparagraph 3, the Plaintiff’s delivery of rent of KRW 40,00,00,000 as the record of the instant lease agreement to the Defendant on March 10, 2014, and the Plaintiff’s delivery of rent to the Plaintiff on July 20, 2014, 20100.

According to the above recognition as to the termination of the lease contract, the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated upon delivery to the defendant on July 22, 2014 of a copy of the complaint of this case, stating the plaintiff's declaration of termination of the lease contract of this case on the grounds of delinquency in rent for more than two years by the defendant.

In regard to this, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as the repair of the building, even though the Defendant could not use part of the function of the building of this case for the purpose of lease due to the erroneous electric measuring instruments, electric ruptures, toilet walls, frequent power failure, etc., so the Defendant’s obligation to allow the Defendant to use and make profits from the object in the lease agreement and the lessee’s obligation to pay rent is mutually responding to each other.