Defendant

A-(A) The crime of 1-A(2), 2-A(3, 5, 6, 7), 6-2(2), 2-2(2), 3-5, 6, and 7(2).

Punishment of the crime

1. [Attachment 2015 Highest 498] Defendant A [criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime at the credit support of Suwon Friwon, which was rendered on April 29, 2013, as a result of fraud;

5.7 The above judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

A. On March 12, 2013, in the I parking lot located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul on March 12, 2013, the Defendant against the victim G paid the victim G interest of KRW 2 million per month if he/she lends 40 million to the K gas station operation funds in the J.

If payment is not made, the K station shall be transferred with the right to operate the station.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant had a debt of more than 100 million won due to the difficult operation of gas stations at the time, and due to the delay in rent of the gas station building around June 2012, the lessor filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the specification of the building and continued trial. Therefore, even if the lessor borrowed money from the damaged person, it was not the ability to either alter it or transfer the right to operate the gas station instead of changing it.

On March 12, 2013, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 35 million won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant on March 12, 2013, and acquired 40 million won in cash on the same day.

B. On December 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the victim F Co., Ltd., the Defendant: (b) on the secondary apartment parking lot located in the New Mine-dong in Gwangju Mine-gu, the Defendant agreed to siren L, the Gwangju Branch Director of F Co., Ltd., and the victim’s Mrocketing car, the victim-owned, for one-day siren; (c) paid a siren of KRW 60,000 per day, and received the said vehicle.

On December 5, 2013, the Defendant demanded the return of the vehicle on the grounds of the expiration of the siren period by posting the above L on telephone, and the Defendant would use the vehicle more.

It is prohibited from joining 700,000 won out of the sirens expenses.

“Along with the rental period,” the rental period was extended.

However, the Defendant did not have any particular income at the time, and was obligated to pay 40 million won to G of the above Paragraph 1.