A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 15, 2016, from around 04:15 to around 04:41 on the same day, there was a dispute in the drinking value from the “abstinence” located in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seogu, and the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) and (b) and (c) and (c) the owner of the business, “A” is aware of the accounts of customers and fluence.

“The 112 Report was filed, and the E and the E and the E- Inspector F arrive at the main place, working as the patrol staff of the D District Police Station of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station.

As the Defendant used the above E to pay the drinking value to himself and return home, “CCTV is visible to confirm ....” The Defendant used a assault to use 2 to 2 to 3 tightly the breast part of the breast part of the breast part of the son, which was held by the said F in order to secure evidence, and symptoms the site situation in the video. In front of the business owner C and C, the Defendant marked an Aropic getable sacle G with its own cell phone in order to secure evidence.

나도 잘 찍어 놨으니까 알아서 하소. 아저씨! 아이고 경찰이라는 게 씨 발 것 들 정의에 대해서는 손을 못 들고. 씨 발 주인한테 손들어 가지고 사진 찍고 있는 저 인간 저게 경찰이라고. 카메라 찍은 경찰관 씨 발 새끼 일로 와 봐라.” 라는 등의 욕설을 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order, and publicly insulting the F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Complaint;

1. Investigation report (applicable Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement of telephone communications of C, which is the main point of week);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the same Act has the history of being punished twice as a crime committed against police officers). In addition, in addition, the instant crime was committed and the imprisonment was chosen, but there was no criminal record above the suspension of execution, the confession of and the attitude against the instant crime was