1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance on the primary claim, the part against the plaintiff on the money ordered to be paid below.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall descriptions and arguments of Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 7, 15, 17, 24, 25, 29, and 37 (including the serial number) as to the primary cause of claim, Eul, the president of the above medical corporation, agreed with the plaintiff and the representative director of the above medical corporation, who had engaged in drug transactions at the time of the above hospital, about the payment of wages to the above hospital employees. Ultimately, the plaintiff paid the amount of wages to the above hospital employees in the manner of directly lending the above hospital employees. If the plaintiff is transferred the above hospital's management right normally, the above hospital employees did not request the repayment of loans to the employees of the above hospital. Accordingly, the above medical corporation did not reach the above medical corporation's order of borrowing the loans (the amount column) and the right of delegation with the plaintiff as the plaintiff as the plaintiff (the plaintiff was not transferred to the above hospital employees at the time of 2013. 13. 214. 31. 2014.

According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to lend the amount equivalent to the Defendant’s benefits for September 2013, and that the Defendant remitted KRW 2,234,840 to the Defendant on October 25, 2013.

Therefore, the defendant's 2,234,840 won of loan and its 2,234,840 won as requested by the plaintiff, after the expiration of a considerable period from the time when the plaintiff notified the return of the loan to the plaintiff, and the defendant's defense from October 28, 2014, which was the date of this decision, which was the date when the defendant delivered the original copy of the payment order of this case to the plaintiff.